01
Realistic attack paths
External, internal, web, API, and cloud testing mapped to how attackers actually move.
WebAPICloudNetwork
Authorized penetration testing
Expose real risk across APIs, cloud, and microservices.
Automize One validates exploitable weaknesses across applications, APIs, cloud, microservices, and networks, then turns the evidence into fixes your team can ship.
Scope
Clear rules
Evidence
Repro steps
Retest
Fix closure
Assessment Console
Authorized TestingCritical
8+
High
22+
Medium
88+
Deliverable
Prioritized report, proof-of-concept evidence, remediation plan, and retest results.
02
Executive clarity
Risk-ranked findings, business impact, screenshots, reproduction steps, and remediation guidance.
03
Retest included
Validate fixes after remediation so your team knows which risks are truly closed.
NDA-first
Confidential scope handling
Rules of engagement
Authorized testing only
Clear evidence
Screenshots and reproduction steps
Remediation support
Practical fix guidance
Services
Penetration testing scopes built around the systems you actually run.
Automize One combines automated discovery with manual exploitation and careful validation, so your team receives findings across web platforms, APIs, cloud workloads, and microservices that are reproducible, prioritized, and ready to fix.
Web Application PT
Manual testing for authentication, authorization, business logic, injection, session handling, and data exposure issues.
- OWASP-aligned coverage
- Business logic abuse
- Evidence-based findings
API Penetration Testing
REST, GraphQL, and backend API assessments focused on broken object access, token misuse, and unsafe integrations.
- Endpoint mapping
- Access control checks
- Abuse-case testing
Microservices Security
Assess service-to-service trust, gateway controls, identity propagation, queues, and containerized application risk.
- Service boundary review
- Auth flow validation
- Architecture-aware findings
Cloud Penetration Testing
Review AWS, Azure, or GCP attack paths for IAM risk, exposed services, misconfigurations, and secrets leakage.
- IAM review
- Cloud posture checks
- Exploitability proof
External Network PT
Assess internet-facing assets, exposed services, VPN gateways, and exploitable network attack paths.
- Attack surface review
- Service validation
- Risk-ranked evidence
Retest and Advisory
Verify fixes, support engineering teams, and convert findings into durable security improvements.
- Fix validation
- Developer guidance
- Closure report
Method
A controlled PT workflow from scope to retest.
The engagement is designed to be useful for engineers, security leaders, and executives at the same time.
01
Scope
Define systems, test windows, access level, success criteria, and rules of engagement before any testing begins.
02
Discover
Map assets, application flows, identities, APIs, exposed services, and likely attack paths.
03
Exploit
Manually validate vulnerabilities, chain impact where appropriate, and avoid unsafe disruption.
04
Report
Deliver risk-ranked findings with proof, impact, remediation guidance, and a clear executive summary.
05
Retest
Confirm fixes, update status, and provide closure evidence for stakeholders and compliance needs.
Deliverables
Reports your engineers can act on and your leadership can understand.
Executive Risk Summary
A concise overview of business impact, critical paths, and the decisions leadership needs to make.
Technical Finding Sheets
Each issue includes severity, affected assets, evidence, reproduction steps, and remediation guidance.
Attack Path Narrative
Where useful, findings are linked into realistic exploitation chains so priority is easy to understand.
Remediation and Retest Log
Track fixed, partially fixed, accepted, and unresolved issues with clear closure evidence.
PT
Web, API, cloud, internal, external
CVSS + context
Severity with business impact
Retest
Validation after remediation
Why Automize One
Offensive security that stays grounded in business reality.
We focus on exploitable risk, clear communication, and practical next steps, so the work improves security after the report is delivered.
Manual validation
Scanner output is treated as a starting point, not the final report. Findings are validated and explained.
Safe execution
Testing follows agreed windows, contacts, rate limits, and stop conditions to protect production systems.
Remediation partnership
Your team gets practical guidance, not vague advice, with optional working sessions for complex fixes.
FAQ
Common questions before a PT engagement.
Clear scope and authorization keep testing useful, ethical, and safe.
What do you need to start a penetration test?+
We begin with scope, authorization, points of contact, testing windows, asset lists, access level, and rules of engagement.
Can you test production systems?+
Yes, when approved. We define safe test limits, timing, and stop conditions before production testing begins.
Do you provide a retest?+
Yes. Retesting is part of the recommended engagement so your team can verify that remediation actually closed the risk.
Will the report work for compliance needs?+
The report includes scope, methodology, findings, evidence, severity, remediation, and retest status, which supports many audit and vendor-review conversations.
Contact
Start with a clear penetration testing scope.
Share the systems you want assessed and the outcome you need. We will help define a responsible scope, timeline, and engagement model.
Response target
1 business day
Best fit
SaaS, fintech, enterprise, and cloud teams
security@automizeone.com